Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded
No Avatar image uploaded
Liverpool Rumours Member Posts
fuser's Profile
Correct Score Competition:
Not entered
Correct Score Competition
Not entered
Correct Score Competition
Flat Out Racing:
Not played Flat Out Racing
Not played Flat Out Racing
No Profile Picture uploaded
Team: Where from: Favourite player: Best team moment: Interests: Timezone: |
fuser's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To fuser's Posts
To fuser's last 5 rumours posts
To fuser's last 5 banter posts
To fuser's last 5 rumour replies
To fuser's last 5 banter replies
fuser's rumours posts with other poster's replies to fuser's rumours posts
26 Apr 2023 14:32:14
Being reported Liverpool are interested in Kalvin Phillips ed002. Any truth?
{Ed002's Note - Kalvin Phillips (DM) Do not rule out Manchester City letting Kalvin Phillips go as they have a replacement in mind to upgrade him. He has been offered around and Liverpool may well be keen. Aston Villa may provide a wildcard option.}
1.) 26 Apr 2023 14:55:04
If Phillips is the answer, you’re asking the wrong question? ?.
2.) 26 Apr 2023 14:59:20
If we're going to test Man City's resolve for one of their midfielders it might be worth a shot at one of the lads they have on loan at Sheffield United this season. Both Tommy Doyle and James McAtee look like very good prospects who may struggle to break in there.
3.) 26 Apr 2023 15:11:04
Klopp's recent quotes strike me that he would be very interested in Phillips, but is skeptical that City would sell to LFC.
4.) 26 Apr 2023 15:21:17
If that really us the calibre of midfielder we are looking at. forget it. Stick with the oldies we have already.
5.) 26 Apr 2023 15:34:48
Ed002, would Phillips be viewed as an alternative to Thuram? I really like the sound of Thuram and would hate us to not sign him because we wanted a lesser player. If we signed Phillips AND Thuram i could live with that. They can both play CM and DM.
I really don't think Phillips is the best option out there though. He's 28 this year. Home grown i guess but it's hardly a rebuild signing injury prone players in their late 20's.
{Ed002's Note - KP would be an alternative to Thuram.}
6.) 26 Apr 2023 16:49:19
I think we'd be better off playing Nate Phillips in midfield and save the money.
7.) 26 Apr 2023 18:05:49
City valued KP highly last year so he must have something about him. Happy for any refreshments in mf to be honest!
8.) 26 Apr 2023 18:11:26
Phillips is a very good player but like many of our current centre mids, he struggles to stay fit and because of this I would stay away. For me though he’s good enough to be in our match day squad and currently I would say the starting 11.
9.) 26 Apr 2023 19:12:51
LFC had interest in Kalvin Phillips last summer. Should he become available I'm sure the interest will be renewed.
{Ed025's Note - your welcome to him mftonjes, bloody awful player and im sure you really need a player with his injury record mate..
10.) 27 Apr 2023 01:56:50
With Keita and Ox leaving, someone needs to keep the physios company Ed.
11.) 27 Apr 2023 13:52:42
I'd hope this is not a serious possibility. His injury record alone should be enough for us to stay clear.
12.) 27 Apr 2023 17:55:20
Hey now, I'm not advocating for the move! I don't think he's awful, but he is indeed overrated. I'm just saying LFC liked him in the recent past and could flirt with the idea of adding him if they believe he's undervalued in the marketplace. That's what they do. Deal hunt.
fuser's banter posts with other poster's replies to fuser's banter posts
27 Jul 2021 20:24:33
Since the HG issue seems to be going over people’s heads. There are currently 17 non-HG players in the Liverpool squad which is the maximum allowed. Potentially Shaq, Minamino and Origi will leave but if none do then there’s no space in the squad to register another non-HG player.
1.) 27 Jul 2021 20:37:11
I’d also shift Matip for the amount that he’s fit.
2.) 27 Jul 2021 21:13:52
Some WILL leave though.
22 Aug 2015 12:54:57
BR coming out and saying that the ref got the offside call right even though the referee association has come out and said it was offside. Do you guys ever get annoyed that he seems to have a fundamental problem with telling the truth?
1.) 22 Aug 2015 13:20:36
It's not a goal and the ref association are trying to defend a stupidity. It's clear cut offside.
2.) 22 Aug 2015 13:21:36
I have a problem with posters picking over every single thing Rodgers says.
3.) 22 Aug 2015 13:35:53
Does any manager "tell the truth". They all claim "haven`t had a chance to look at it" or "didn`t see it", when ask about an obvious error by the ref that goes in their favour.
Please, please, please lay off Rogers, and stop getting on like a big girls blouse, looking to nit pick at every little thing.
Like it or not he is Liverpool manager, so if you can`t be positive at least don`t be negative.
4.) 22 Aug 2015 13:41:51
"Oh yeah, it was defintely offside. Oh and by the way, the Bournemouth goal should have stood. Lovren was playing for a foul."
Think about a second. If it doesn't make sense to you that Rodgers defended the goal, then stick your head in some ice water and try again.
5.) 22 Aug 2015 13:44:17
Irish Rover, it was hardly a one line comment said in between other topics, but an entire article so not really trying to pick over every tiny thing to find fault with him. I only asked as last season after every match that you guys played badly, he'd come out and praise the team's work rate etc. And whilst I can understand wanting to defend/protect your team, this was a very clear cut decision and one in which the Premier League even came out and said the ref got it wrong.
6.) 22 Aug 2015 13:57:58
What he is saying is it is a goal! Which it is! It won us the game! So it is a goal! Care to argue this fact?
7.) 22 Aug 2015 14:00:50
Fuser
Its boring!
8.) 22 Aug 2015 14:03:06
It was a goal, we won one nil, time to move on.
9.) 22 Aug 2015 14:37:02
I'm not debating whether it was a goal or not. The ref gave it, so it was a goal. My point was BR said that Coutinho wasn't interfering, and saying that he shouldn't have been called offside.
Amerigo tbh I think BR should be coming out, saying all of that AND giving up the 3 points to Bournemouth, paying for all of Bournemouth's travelling fans tickets out of his own pocket and even writing a public letter of apology.
10.) 22 Aug 2015 15:57:08
Mu got 6 pts from two deflected goals so I think we are entitled to a bit of luck also
11.) 22 Aug 2015 17:46:28
And City's result against Chelsea was a fake result and arsene wenger has never seen any of arsenals offsides and Ferguson never said that any of uniteds many many dubious late penalty awards were wrong!
12.) 22 Aug 2015 18:00:16
I'm sure it won't be the only incorrect decision that results in a goal and a win this season in the PL - time to thank our lucky stars and move on, as I'm sure we'll have our share of bad luck too.
13.) 22 Aug 2015 18:05:55
Better pray that luck doesn't run out soon because with the shambles we are seein on the pitch ATM, were going to need every ounce of it
14.) 22 Aug 2015 19:37:35
I look at the results and they say we won.
Hindsight is irrelevant.
15.) 22 Aug 2015 23:17:44
If hindsight is irrelevant, how does anyone learn?
Reflection is a key part of any profession.
16.) 23 Aug 2015 00:01:52
If it had been Mourinho that said that (using him as an example not chelsea related); then everyone would've said a great way to play mind games with the next referee we have.
I don't rate the bloke but be fair at least!
17.) 23 Aug 2015 00:13:38
Of course it is, Ron provided it is in an attempt to make your BFF look good, which it doesn't.
18.) 23 Aug 2015 03:24:50
What BR said was that it was an excellent decision by the 'linesman'. And he was right, it was an excellent decision for LFC. Stop reading redtops who love to twist words. And no, I don't like most of his interviews myself. Don't buy/read on newsnow the 'Scum'
19.) 23 Aug 2015 07:54:54
Well if that is how it works.
Sterling was on side against city so we won the league!! I'm happy enough to trade 3 points for the title!!
Better knock that star off the England football kit as well.
20.) 23 Aug 2015 09:58:05
wiwar- hindsight is obviously not always irrelevant in life, but as there is no retrospective action with regards to offside decisions in association football, in this instance hindsight is irrelevant. The result is already a matter of historical fact.
21.) 23 Aug 2015 10:40:45
Mourinho gets away with it because his team are the Champions so people think his mind games are working
I personally admired his handling of the media in his first spell but now I just see him as a pantomime villain - it's so over the top now it has become ridiculous
Think BR is just trying to mimic him
27 Apr 2014 22:45:17
A lot of you seem to be complaining about the way Chelsea played. But it was the smart thing to do. Teams that play 'attractive attacking football' have come to Anfield and lost. If Chelsea had played attacking football they would have lost too. Especially since Hazard's injured, Oscar's gone off the boil, Schurrle is a bag of Revels and Willian hasn't been the best in the attacking 3rd. I won't even bother mentioning their misfiring strikers.
15 Apr 2024 20:48:27
It’s obviously Sam Allardyce wdw ??.
13 Apr 2024 21:22:08
FPF, record breaking revenues? Don’t Utd& City both have higher revenues in the PL alone? Pretty sure Barcelona and Real have higher too so not sure what records are being broken.
11 Apr 2024 21:28:44
Given De Laurentis and Napoli are renowned for asking for top dollar and the fact Osimhen will likely be leaving for 100-130m. They’ll have even less need to sell Kvicha so can see needing to pay at least 50m on top of whatever Diaz may fetch.
04 Apr 2024 23:38:20
Money doesn’t necessarily guarantee success, only have to look at Chelsea rn and even Utd has spent close to a billion over the last few years. But I would worry that City could spend £1bn and just dominate given how well run they are. And the wealth tax even if it was 100% would just see the other clubs given £50m each in exchange no ed001? Doubt the extra £50m each would help other clubs to compete. Could potentially allow other clubs like Newcastle to spend massively so could allow owners who don’t mind investing money without return but I see it becoming a much more negative thing imo. Think it would see even worse inflationary price rises for players if sovereign wealth fund backed clubs are allowed to spend as much as they wish.
19 Mar 2024 19:03:16
I’d imagine the sale of Salah would only cover 50~75% of the fee for Musiala.
17 Apr 2024 16:39:03
OliRed, the £80m he was bought for in 2019 is spread across his contract. After 5 years his book value is around 15m, so if he’s sold for anything more than that it would be recorded as a profit.
17 Apr 2024 00:39:27
£65-70m and sell easy.
27 Mar 2024 19:15:34
Most the replies seem to fail the OP’s actual question, with some listing 2-3 players from Arsenal etc and some even choosing players from outside the top 4 ?
Wdw, do Liverpool really need another 2 CM’s in Rodri and Douglas luiz?
05 Mar 2024 23:19:35
Beckers Pecker I hadn’t realised that the bundesliga had ended 3 weeks ago when it was announced that Tuchel was leaving? Or are Leverkusen over 30 points in front of Bayern and unable to be caught up since there’s 10 games left?
Tuchel isn’t being sacked for coming second (since that’s not even confirmed yet ?) it’s due to disagreements both with the board and with members of the squad.
The whole Alonso will get time at Liverpool, so if he were to drop out of the top 4 and finish 5 or 6 after Klopp potentially winning the Quadruple you think everything will still be sunshine and rainbows?
02 Mar 2024 00:47:49
Doesn’t Musiala play LW/ AM? Also pretty sure ed said Liverpool had zero interest.