Liverpool Rumours Member Posts
Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.
Single or recurring donationIf you have a question for Ed1, press the big button.
mftonjes's Profile
Current Avatar:
Flat Out Racing:
Not played Flat Out Racing
Not played Flat Out Racing
No Profile Picture uploaded
Team: Liverpool Where from: Favourite player: Best team moment: Interests: Timezone: (GMT -5:00) Bogota |
mftonjes's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To mftonjes's Posts
To mftonjes's last 5 rumour replies
30 Sep 2019 13:20:06
eds, what about piotr zielinski? i believe there was interest from LFC in the recent past, and from what i can tell, his contract expires summer of 2021. do you think there is still a fit there and would there be interest from LFC?
{Ed002's Note - I am not aware of interest right now but certainly there was interest in 2016 - and they could well have signed him in place of GW had the club behaved professionally.}
30 Sep 2019 13:11:38
i used to disagree with the eds on their stance that there isn't room for another great rotating player in the front 3, but it's (finally) becoming clear to me that klopp prefers a short bench and likes playing guys that he trusts. he has the firepower that he needs in mane, firmino, and salah, and has cover for them with origi and shaqiri, and extended cover for them with lallana, keita, brewster, and elliott.
25 Sep 2019 16:57:22
it will be interesting to see how quickly this matos addition will stir back up the ruben neves rumors.
24 Sep 2019 19:13:23
the new balance brand isn't as strong or notable as nike, but new balance items are a much superior quality to anything nike makes. i'm in the minority, but i'd hate to see us switch. we're so concerned about being viewed as a BIG CLUB though, that it seems like we've already made up our mind about going with nike. new balance linked up with us during bad times, so it would be nice to see us continue to partner together during these much better times. if new balance doesn't want to match the offer that's one thing, but if we're not honoring the essence of the agreement, then that would be really disappointing.
24 Sep 2019 13:54:44
i just read james pearce's article about this. the dispute is over the definition of "matching" an offer. the cash shouldn't be an issue, as new balance can probably find investors to match the fee. the issue is over the distribution networks. nike being more established worldwide, and is able to give LFC access to markets around the world that new balance cannot. how much is that worth and is it something that the contract says should be considered when giving new balance the right to match? that's likely why it's heading to court, to get clarity on that.
mftonjes has no Banter Replies