Liverpool Rumours Member Posts

 

lfcohio's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded
Correct Score Competition:

Not entered
Correct Score Competition
Flat Out Racing:

Not played Flat Out Racing


No Profile Picture uploaded

Team:


Where from:


Favourite player:


Best team moment:


Interests:


Timezone:




lfcohio's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To lfcohio's Posts

 

 

To lfcohio's last 5 rumours posts

 

To lfcohio's last 5 banter posts

 

To lfcohio's last 5 rumour replies

 

To lfcohio's last 5 banter replies

 

lfcohio's rumours posts with other poster's replies to lfcohio's rumours posts

 

22 Aug 2019 18:39:08
Liverpool to sign nike deal? Gross. Nike can't make a good looking kit to save their life. Would prefer less money and better kits!

lfcohio

1.) 22 Aug 2019 20:03:28
Is it your money lfcohio? 😅.


2.) 22 Aug 2019 20:27:40
Don't buy the Nike shirt then. It really is that simple. Whining for the sake of whining.


3.) 22 Aug 2019 22:03:15
LFCohio the kit will be red . I'm not a fan of nike kits but if it's a reportedly record deal well that's fine in my book our main competitor have an endless money pit . Personally the only time I'd wear a replica kit is on the 5 a side pitch.


4.) 23 Aug 2019 08:42:48
Posted this on the forum back in January and got bashed because it was Nike, just google 2006-08 Holland Home Shirt which is a Nike top, its an absolute fantastic item, I would love a LFC shirt in that style.


5.) 23 Aug 2019 09:22:19
No agreement yet with Nike anyway.


6.) 23 Aug 2019 19:15:19
So we are led to believe virg.


7.) 23 Aug 2019 19:59:04
I'd like Nike sponsorship, generally it's great quality gear, I'm not sure why so many here despise the brand? They will provide the club with a great financial upgrade in income which is the main thing.


8.) 24 Aug 2019 02:20:03
Cant be worse than nb second and third kits amyway.


9.) 24 Aug 2019 07:07:36
I don’t particularly like Nike, but it’s completely irrelevant, the important thing is that (at least according to Forbes), this is a very very lucrative deal for us and the biggest in the Premier League, by some margin apparently. Let’s give credit to the owners for negotiating these commercial deals, they’re putting right the wrongs of the last 30 years of maladministration under Moores then H and G.


10.) 24 Aug 2019 20:00:58
Har_red92, Nike aren’t what you could call the most ethical company in the world, for example the allegations of sweat shop labour, the way it treated its employees in America, and that’s only part of the bad press. However, compared to the activities of the owners of Man City (ie a theocratic fascist state) they’re almost saints. And if it gives us a better commercial presence and expands the club globally, we have to accept it for what it is.


11.) 25 Aug 2019 00:13:26
Yeah well 6times I'm not really one to get hung up on the ethical side of their business as it's not something I know much about, I'm simply hopeful that we can get the best deal we can without over thinking too deeply.


12.) 25 Aug 2019 09:58:35
Prefer nike to new balance and warrior! We have had some dreadful kits over the years with Reebok and Adidas, absolutely shocking. Nice all red plainish Nike kit will be good.
Nice to have the largest sporting brand in the world affiliated and paying handsomely, nice to see the club doing so well financially in terms of revenue! We do lack still to United but making strides to become the Nº1 both on and off the pitch.


 

 

17 Nov 2017 22:11:11
Eds, any news on Cans contract? I saw a report that he's willing to sign if wages are met? I hope he stays, I think him and keita could form a long term partnership and with our attack, if we sort out our defense I think we could be real contenders!

On a side note. Since it's nearly impossible to use the search function for "can" can we all agree to use Ecan or some other name when referring to can?

lfcohio

{Ed002's Note - it remains as was - he wants out unless Liverpool sign up to x and y. Can’s name is pounouncec Chuun. Maybe that would work. Or replace him with Goretzka.}


1.) 18 Nov 2017 07:59:08
Can I ask what x and y are? Are they to do with playing time?

{Ed002's Note - Critically money and a low termination clause.}


2.) 19 Nov 2017 08:55:10
Specifically HIGH money and LOW release clause. Oh for the optimism of youth!

{Ed001's Note - it is not as high as you would think, he would get more by moving. And the release clause is much more than we would get if he just left in summer. Not sure that it is that optimistic personally, his agent is just making sure Can can get out if he is pushed into the background.}


3.) 19 Nov 2017 12:44:26
My understanding is that he wants 150,000 per week and that the release clause is somewhere between 25,000 and 30,000.


4.) 19 Nov 2017 14:11:27
If he leaves in summer, I doubt Juve can give him 150k/ wk. maybe Citeh can trump that. But he will leave on free which is crazy.

If I am negotiating, I will put certain margin of trade off to salary and sell on clause. Higher salary means higher sell on clause. Can will. have to choose. E. g I can pay you 100k/ wk which 50k/ wk less than what you want but I can lower sell on clause say from 35mil to 30mil.

{Ed001's Note - why would you doubt that? Clearly you have no idea about the financial situation at Juve. They pay high wages and can easily afford that.}


5.) 21 Nov 2017 07:00:47
To be fair to him and/ or his agent they're going about this in a better way to the club than a certain team mate. Maybe some people just have a better understanding about not burning bridges.


 

 

28 Oct 2017 16:15:52
Eds, how close is ings from making his way back into the first team? Do you think he has a role in our future? I hope so. I think he's definitely better than AOC.

lfcohio

{Ed002's Note - I suspect a loan in January is his best bet to be honest Ohio. May make the bench before then but Klopp prefers Firmino and Sturridge with Solanke also ahead of him - and Origi is to come back next year by what I hear wanting to fight for a start.}


1.) 28 Oct 2017 16:43:07
Give it a rest for one day Lfcohio. We are currently winning 3.0 and you are on giving Aoc a hard time when he's looked alright last few appearances and doesn't even play in same position as Ings! As for ings I agree with ed002 a loan makes sense and wish him all the best as showed great determination.


2.) 28 Oct 2017 21:54:59
I like AOC. He may not be a game-changer, but he is solid and does the basics well. This is something that can't be said about the majority of the rest of the team recently. He rarely gives the ball away. He is willing to go past his man, and usually does, he looks up before he puts a cross in, aims for a red shirt, and usually puts it in this direction and out of reach of their keeper. That's good enough for me.

Great result today. And we scored from a corner!


 

 

16 Apr 2017 04:04:27
Ed's, is there any chance of us getting Hart? I'm really really hoping the answer is an emphatic no. I don't think he's ever been good and is only comparable to migs at best. Do forget, Hart has made a meal of things with good defenders in front of him week in week out. Mignolet has yet been afforded that opportunity since moving to Liverpool. We haven't had a good defense in years and any time we start to put one together, it's decimated by injuries, suspensions etc etc. I really hope it's a no, but lately it seems to be that if I don't want it, it happens!

lfcohio

{Ed001's Note - no, Hart was watched a few times and made more clangers than Peter Firmin (sorry you might not get that reference but me ma will!). Interest in him has nosedived with only a few left with any interest, luckily, right now anyway, only the blue half of Merseyside are still showing any.}


1.) 16 Apr 2017 11:39:36
when you have robles in goal, joe hart is bound to be seen as a upgrade!


2.) 16 Apr 2017 13:55:19
Peter Firmin, that's a soup dragon of a response, lol. Brilliant!


3.) 18 Apr 2017 19:38:07
Hart is pants and his tenure at Torino shows it. They will be glad to see the back of him come this summer.


4.) 19 Apr 2017 06:47:59
I don't think people should worry about all these keepers they don't rate coming in. One look at the way Karius was treated and the contempt so many fans show for pretty much every keeper around bar a handful LFC couldn't even dream of signing, will put them all off. So Mignolet and Karius for next season, unless Migs gets sick of it and takes advantage of the interest his game time will have created.


 

 

09 Nov 2015 18:59:03
Ed's, any news on Sakho?

lfcohio

{Ed001's Note - nothing confirmed, but it does not look good right now.}


1.) 09 Nov 2015 19:46:42
A statement from the French Football Federation read: "Mamadou Sakho, who suffered a sprained right knee during Liverpool's game against Crystal Palace, has been forced to withdraw for France's upcoming international friendly games.

This came from Skysports.


2.) 10 Nov 2015 02:25:36
Sounds like good news that Sakho not playing the international. Could be blessing in disguise.


 

 

 

lfcohio's banter posts with other poster's replies to lfcohio's banter posts

 

08 Jul 2019 12:51:52
Ed's, salah and mane are both 27. In the next few years they'll begin to lose a bit of pace that is a key part of their game, or sooner if, God forbid, they have an injury. We've seen it happen before with players like Torres and Sturridge where speed is a critical part of their success and are never quite the same once they lose a step. Is there a plan to cash in on either of these players before they begin to see a decline in their value? Not that I want either to leave as they're fantastic players but I'm also trying to look at this from a business perspective and what's best for Liverpool long term.

lfcohio

{Ed002's Note - The situation with Salah has been done to death. The club is almost certainly not having such thoughts.}


1.) 08 Jul 2019 15:14:38
As top notch footballers, it's up to them to adapt their game to suit any loss of pace that may occur. There's no reason why they can't play at their current level for another 5 years and that's an age in football terms. Look at Ronaldo as a prime example.


2.) 08 Jul 2019 16:12:14
Its a decent point though, and i haven't seen the subject discussed before. I've certainly not thought about it.

I think 27 is considered as being a players prime, 26 to 30 id say. And we want the best players possible to be playing for us in their prime, so i wouldn't be thinking of selling atm. And i think that the very best players can still fetch hefty transfer fees when 29/ 30.

I think its hard for us liverpool fans, sometimes, to not always be thinking of losing or selling our best players. The thing is, why do we need money if not to buy the best players we can and improve the squad? I don't think there are many better lw rw than mane and salah and both seem happy at liverpool.

Mind you it is something that may need considering in a few years time. I don't see salah staying til he's 30, but i hope he does of course.


3.) 08 Jul 2019 17:07:40
There's 3 Liverpool players that I can think of (and probably more that aren't spring to mind) that disprove that you should sell a player because their ageing is affecting their pace.

1: John Barnes. Absolute class on the left wing with his pace, skill and crossing. When he'd lost the pace, he dropped into a deep holding midfield player and was very good at it.

2: James Milner. All throughout his career he's been a winger and his desire to move into the centre of midfield is one of the reasons he joined Liverpool. He has perfectly adapted his game to be a centre-mid.

3: Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain. Has always been a winger at Southampton and Arsenal. Came to Liverpool under the promise he'd be used more centrally. He's not at the age yet where his pace will dwindle, but he's already made the switch of position to make losing his pace in later years less crucial as he's already developing in the central role.

Both at 27 there's no need for them to feel any urgency to change position, and Arjen Robben and Franck Ribery are proof that you don't even need to change position if your body is up to it. I do feel that either would be comfortable as a second striker or no.10 in the future.


4.) 08 Jul 2019 17:11:46
I'm not an expert on these 2 players. But I imagine as we see with Ronaldo (and even God when he plays a charity match), technique and the intelligence doesn't go. It's the same in tennis as well where you're seeing Federer change his playing style over the last few years so it's less reliant on pace and long rallies. Then you have players like Milner who is in fantastic shape for his age. But a winger I don't know. I'd be interested to hear opinions on this. Still, it's years away anyway.


5.) 08 Jul 2019 19:24:54
OP, the issue with your opinion is that both these players do not rely on pace alone. Mane for example when he came to us, was pacy and quick. Now, his game is much more than that. His repertoire is more diverse cos he can play every attacking position currently (including the no. 10 role he plays for Senegal), in contrast to when he first came to us as a pure wideman. Pace has now become a part of Mane's game. He is way better than that now and he can always hone his game to play at the highest level for years even when he loses his pace cos he will. Same with Salah.

Salah came to us as a winger with pace. Now, look at him. He is now a well-rounded attacking talent, one who can play all three attacking positions. In fact, he plays the playmaker role for Egypt BUT not centrally. He does this from a wide position, if you like. I would not worry about both these players cos they are way too intelligent to rely on pace as they get older.


 

 

31 May 2019 22:05:41
My birthday is tomorrow. Really hoping that the boys can get me a nice present and beat spuds 4-0!

lfcohio

{Ed025's Note - all the best for tomorrow mate..


1.) 31 May 2019 23:13:02
Happy birthday to you mate.


2.) 01 Jun 2019 09:46:42
Happy birthday.


 

 

08 Apr 2019 03:24:08
Ed's submitted a post a while back but never saw it on the site or in my profile. Have any of the Ed's seen an analysis of what the table would look like had VAR been implemented this year? I ask this whils thinking we've actually been very fortunate this season (especially compared to previous seasons) but after the Chelsea Cardiff game where Chelsea had an offside goal and then an arguable red card not called I'd be interested to see what team would be in what position with VAR. Keep up the good work!

lfcohio

{Ed001's Note - how can there be such a thing when no one knows what VAR would have decided? It has been shown around the world to be about as reliable as an old banger bought off Ebay for £25. There will be little difference as there will still be the same corrupt organisation running it, except that instead of the supposedly best referees in the countries making all the decisions you will now be asking the ones not good enough for the Prem to check those decisions afterwards!}


1.) 08 Apr 2019 04:43:06
Which is why Ed1 it's one of them for me mate, it shouldn't bloody exist unless it can be done right, nothing will change but people are talking like it'll suddenly fix everything, it won't. It's a waste of time, effort and money! well, I don't know about the 'effort' bit.

{Ed001's Note - the most bizarre thing about it is that, as they do not have enough Premier League refs to run it, they are going to employ refs from the lower leagues to do so. It should be totally separate, if you are going to get people from the lower leagues, get ex-pros and train them specifically in the role as well. Get a different view than just these incompetent buffoons that run (or not in Jon Moss's case) around the pitch making bad calls all game long.}


2.) 08 Apr 2019 05:10:48
Lol it says it all mate, it's a failure before it's even started! I remember you saying last year that it should have an independent body running things then it might've looked promising but with this setup there's just no point to it. I really don't understand how anybody can be excited about it, what next? stuff like this is just damaging the sport further imo, like it wasn't bad enough they have to make it as bad if not worse? pointless.

{Ed001's Note - it certainly didn't help the cup semis! All this standing around waiting for things to be checked is ridiculous. Sadly it is going to happen, no matter how badly implemented, so we will just have to get used to it and the no doubt heavily edited images that get released to show how the decision was reached.}


3.) 08 Apr 2019 05:22:43
See that's another big issue of mine with it, is all this waiting around like lemons for them to make a decision, get on with the bloody game! but yeah you're right, we can talk about it until we're blue in the face, it's coming and that's that. Can you imagine the amount of conversations this is going to bring next season on here? lol. Those who currently back it will soon be against it that's for sure.

{Ed001's Note - it is bad enough that we have to wait twenty minutes while players perform somersaults before lying prone on the turf pretending to have been shot after every tackle in the hope of getting someone sent off. The game is getting too stop-start and it is not helping it. Still I understand why FIFA/UEFA and the FA like it - the stop and check will be a great time to put in an advert, FIFA were shopping that around ahead of the World Cup, so that will be next.}


4.) 08 Apr 2019 05:54:10
Goal line technology works because it's exact with no arguments. Var will still have much interpretation and as such be problematic, leave we'll alone.
Would var have ruled out Keith's goal due to early offside? If so that's ridiculous as it was a couple of goal attmpts earlier, how far do you go back? Until the last stoppage in play or change of possession? That could be 5 minutes earlier.


5.) 08 Apr 2019 06:19:26
The way VAR deals with offsides is ridiculous. Linesman are told to keep their flag down but if no goal occurs then play carries on. Except every decision affects the run of play so either all offsides should be dealt with by VAR and linesman keep their flags down and play is pulled back when an offside is detected or linesmen deal with it as in the past and we deal with the odd bad decision.


6.) 08 Apr 2019 06:24:32
Although now I think about it. how long is allowed between a foul not seen by the ref and a goal for the foul not to be considered in the build up? Can a ref give a yellow card retrospectively after seeing said foul on the VAR system or not considering he saw the incident before and didn’t consider it a foul or is that silly rule just confined to committees who review the game.

{Ed025's Note - its all very complicated frankie, i think it will ruin the game myself, it will turn into something akin to american football and games will drag on while they sort out the decisions..


7.) 08 Apr 2019 07:04:42
If VAR worked, Kyle Walker would've been sent off.


8.) 08 Apr 2019 08:23:46
I’ve watched quite a bit of bundesliga this season and they’ve used VAR this season and it hasn’t been great. Long breaks and decisions that are made clearly by none football people.

There was a handball which led to a pen given to Leipzig in the Leipzig vs Leverkusen game this weekend which was never a deliberate handball and it was the ball literally skimmed his finger tips and still went to a Leipzig player as the ball didn’t change direction. That made it 2-2 was a massive decision and they still couldn’t make the right one.


9.) 08 Apr 2019 08:24:04
I read an article last week that analysed all bad decisions and the probable affect on the outcome of the game. It looked at the real obvious ones like Liverpool's offside right in front of the linesman. It put Liverpool top of the table by 5 points.
It is a difficult one as they still gave the win to Liverpool on that one because of the final result, the way both teams played, how early it was in the game etc. City seemed to have more that affected points with a draw or 2.1 win etc. Very debatable as a first goal can change the whole game and approach of teams etc but very interesting reading.
I have a lot of United supporter friends who say Liverpool are getting all the decisions (which they have had a few) but when I spoke to them about it they were mentioning late wins against Everton and Spurs which wasn't decisions just good luck and keeping at it till the final whistle. They also seem to easily forget decisions against Liverpool like the ball moving before the free kick against Spurs and the definite penalty against Southampton.
Interesting reading not VAR but interesting!


10.) 08 Apr 2019 09:04:54
We have var in Australia and it's an absolute mess! It still comes down to a human being making the end decision and they are still very able to get it wrong. Happens just about every week over here.


11.) 08 Apr 2019 09:11:21
This season the VAR officials have been from the select group 1.


12.) 08 Apr 2019 09:51:42
Surely as the tech improves and in time officials will get better at spotting fouls and interpreting rules?

It’ll be dodgy for a few years but no worse than ‘no VAR’ then hopefully accuracy and speed will improve.


13.) 08 Apr 2019 11:12:37
I’m with you Ron. The early stages may not have been great but the World Cup showed that there is reason to be optimistic about it in the main and people were generally pleasantly surprised afterwards. VAR is not there to run the game but to change obvious refereeing errors. When the kinks are ironed out and a more seamless system is put in place I think it will only be for the benefit of the game. It certainly can't be any worse than the massive weekly mistakes made now.


14.) 08 Apr 2019 15:57:17
We can only hope. They do need to be able to look at it in real time as well as slow mo though as MK pointed out Kyle Walker should of lived up to his surname.


15.) 08 Apr 2019 18:00:08
Surely it can only be pulled back as long as the refs usual advantage lasts for. Even today, refs can issue yellow cards for tackles that were made minutes earlier but advantage was given. It may not be perfect and I'm not totally convinced by the stoppages, but there's no point moaning about it like you said. The technology is there and should be embraced. Just look at the Cardiff game, that result could cost that club millions and any technology that can help in those situations should be welcomed.


16.) 08 Apr 2019 19:07:09
Bring on the robots.


 

 

17 Mar 2019 12:05:23
Ed's, it's far from over, but of the current teams in relegation (Cardiff, Fulham, Huddersfield as of today) are there any players you think might be worth a go on the relatively cheap?

lfcohio

{Ed002's Note - So you think it a good idea to replace players from a team at the top of the league with players from relegated sides?}


1.) 17 Mar 2019 12:51:26
Worked with robbo 🤭.


2.) 17 Mar 2019 12:56:32
Well in Benny! 😂 oh, cheeky.
Good point though.


3.) 17 Mar 2019 13:07:22
And partly Shaqiri (for first half of season)


4.) 17 Mar 2019 13:10:37
Robbo, Wijnaldum and Shaqiri were all signed from relegated sides so I don't think there's any problem with that (okay, slight caveat, Shaq's level has dropped in recent months) .


5.) 17 Mar 2019 13:26:13
Mooey can't spell his name, Aaron is first name I think. Huddersfield lad. I'm not saying he would be a starter and I know we have lots of cms but he has that attacking flair that our cms lack bar keita, lallana and milner. I just think he would bring a new aspect to the team.

Also shurrle from Fulham. Had a poor season but is a great player with bags of potential. Would provide cover for lots of positions.

And Ryan sessegnon. Would be a great back up for robbo although the lad has so much promise I can't see him wanting to play second fiddle.

{Ed002's Note - This would be to replace Keita? Or who? Would Sessegnon move to sit on the bench? A possible Mane replacement I suppose.}


6.) 17 Mar 2019 13:34:55
Ryan sessegnon would be my pick if he was happy to be a squad player. Bags of potential there, can play lb or could rotate with either winger.

{Ed002's Note - Another £50M squad player? He will move somewhere that wants him.}


7.) 17 Mar 2019 13:42:30
That's a fair point ed, thought we might have been able to snipe him for cheaper than that. Just figured he would be a good option to have as well as add to English players in squad but the kid should be trying to get regular game time which we couldn't offer him.


8.) 17 Mar 2019 14:11:16
In response to Ed's 002, you're saying that among the three teams and 36+/ - players playing top flight football week in week out there aren't any players even worth looking at simply because they're in a relegation battle? I wonder where you would draw the line for looking at a player? If a team is one point out of relegation are there players worth looking at? How about 2? To insinuate there aren't individual quality players in a team sport seems nonsensical to me. And no, I'm not saying they need to be starters, but perhaps squad players or depth? We have an aging milner, low depth on the wing backs, and obviously (pending catastrophy) going do be in the champions league next year and could use quality and depth next season. Surely if there is a bargain we'd want to take advantage (like shaqiri and Robertson) . Just thought it would be a fun talking point at the very least but I sure hope our scouts aren't so pretentious and are willing to look at talent regardless of league or position in the table. After all, vvd was playing in Scotland not long ago and I think we can all agree that's a much weaker league. or mahrez that was playing in league 2 not long ago.

{Ed002's Note - It is not worth the bother quite frankly. Liverpool are doing really well and are top of the league, and they have some very good youngsters coming through. Now would be a great time to start listing which of the players and youngsters you want to move on to replace with players from relegated teams. Every week I read of the fans, win or lose, who want players out of the club. From my perspective the club should do no more than a little bit of refinement - but what do I know.}


9.) 17 Mar 2019 16:42:35
I think there are some limited opportunities with clubs lower down to pick up someone who is good value.

However my view and I hold to it is that we need to strengthen the overall squad and have some other game changers. I'm not convinced the up and coming kids are ready to simply be on the bench and change games.

For me I'd get a quality RB, have TAA as options for RB and midfield, Id get a striker to replace Sturridge and also some legs in midfield plus the big buy of the summer a world class attacking midfielder. Do we need much else?


10.) 17 Mar 2019 18:59:18
id like us to finally bring mitrovic in to fulfil Ed02s prophecy!

plus we need the backup in the attacking third!


11.) 17 Mar 2019 18:31:22
I’m sorry Ed02 but why does buying a player mean they are a squad player can’t they play or push for a place? Sanchez is 300k a week squad player? Mahrez a 50 million squad player? These two barely play, yet we play the same three week in week out, and don’t really have an option of that calibre to rotate with, or make an impact off the bench. I know Sanchez hasn’t made any sort of impact, but they still bought him knowing they had Rashford martial Lukaku Lingard mata.
To fight on all fronts you need a squad, not just an eleven, so why is having options up front an issue. I’m sure Sturridge will be gone, and maybe ings Permanently, so we really only have shaq and Origi to rotate or come on.

{Ed002's Note - Manchester United and Manchester City are in a different place to Liverpool. Sanchez is constraining MU for FFP. Manchester City has players who are pissed because they are not playing. I guess you cannot see the big pictuire and asume you expect Brewster sold?}


12.) 17 Mar 2019 22:52:13
At the start of the season we had ings, Solanke Sturridge and Origi as strikers - and I know that’s too many - now we have two left, with one maybe both leaving. Brewster hasn’t had 90 mins of prem football yet, and whilst I want us to develop youth and have a pathway to the first team, we can’t bank on him being good enough to come in for Firmino if he was out. Okay, at the moment, we would bring in Origi and he has done well enough for me, considering the limited minutes he has had. I also understand that city probably have too many options in attack. I imagine sane is completely happy with his game time either. But still, god forbid we lost one of the front three for an extended period, we are losing a lot of quality with our replacements. Hence it’s an area I think we need to address, and don’t see it as one in one out. I’m not saying a 80 million pound player, but if we did buy someone of quality as a striker or winger, I think they’d get enough minutes to be satisfied in their first season, and allow us to rotate a little more when needed.


13.) 18 Mar 2019 15:41:39
Replacements for Migs and Moreno Hessle, neither will want to waste another year of their careers on our bench.


 

 

25 Oct 2018 02:49:40
Ed's, salahs body language, even after scoring, makes him seem unhappy. Do you think (or know) if he's unhappy. I think he's looked sick/ unhealthy at times too. Any reason to worry or does he just need some time in the sun?

lfcohio

{Ed001's Note - he will be fine mate.}


1.) 25 Oct 2018 05:20:15
it was more a sigh of relief after scoring really. could have score 20 by the time he scored. He was going offside a lot and that happens when you are very desperate to score some goal. Eagerness gets you and that must have been frustrating for him. It was probably just him not liking his performance till then.


2.) 25 Oct 2018 06:26:12
Hate the couch psychology game. but on pure aesthetics was thinking salah has been looking a bit gaunt and pale lol rekon he just doesn't look too fresh.


3.) 25 Oct 2018 07:55:59
Check out his Instagram, he seemed pretty healthy on his jet ski!


4.) 25 Oct 2018 19:35:40
OP, you're reading too much into things. Players don't celebrate all the time esp. those who are battling form on the pitch and have issues off it with Salah not being fully healthy and stuff with his country's FA. He's good, man. He'll be fine.


 

 

 

lfcohio's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

31 Aug 2017 12:35:27
Wouldnt this make klopp and the management look like fools after months of 'not for sale at any cost' to turn around and say 'just kidding we sold him 2 weeks ago! '? Makes little sense.

lfcohio

 

 

Click To View This Thread

14 Jul 2017 01:39:32
I can see in getting some time to give lallana, mane or firminio a rest. I still think he'll be great and definitely a fan favorite!

lfcohio

 

 

Click To View This Thread

27 Jun 2017 15:43:26
I'll go on record saying I did not and do not rate gini. He often goes missing, he's not creative, his passing is ok at best and he's not a good tackler. I'm hoping to see him as a sub in the coming seasons. He certainly isn't good enough to be a starter. I watched every game this season and never saw a performance that warranted all the praise he's gotten. He's mediocre at best. Just a body to throw on the field.

lfcohio

 

 

Click To View This Thread

27 Jun 2017 12:24:33
If we sign ox, I'm going to be insistent on one of 3 things. A director of football to oversee transfers 2. A new manager or 3. At the very least, a visit to the optometrist. What a sad, underwhelming signing. Would be better with youth or just handing me the 25 million. Dumb.

lfcohio

 

 

Click To View This Thread

20 Jun 2017 22:47:41
Ed's can you explain fulham not wanting to do business with Liverpool. I. e. what we did to them.

lfcohio

{Ed007's Note - Pumped their mam!}


 

 

 

lfcohio's banter replies

 

Click To View This Thread

17 Mar 2019 14:11:16
In response to Ed's 002, you're saying that among the three teams and 36+/ - players playing top flight football week in week out there aren't any players even worth looking at simply because they're in a relegation battle? I wonder where you would draw the line for looking at a player? If a team is one point out of relegation are there players worth looking at? How about 2? To insinuate there aren't individual quality players in a team sport seems nonsensical to me. And no, I'm not saying they need to be starters, but perhaps squad players or depth? We have an aging milner, low depth on the wing backs, and obviously (pending catastrophy) going do be in the champions league next year and could use quality and depth next season. Surely if there is a bargain we'd want to take advantage (like shaqiri and Robertson) . Just thought it would be a fun talking point at the very least but I sure hope our scouts aren't so pretentious and are willing to look at talent regardless of league or position in the table. After all, vvd was playing in Scotland not long ago and I think we can all agree that's a much weaker league. or mahrez that was playing in league 2 not long ago.

lfcohio

{Ed002's Note - It is not worth the bother quite frankly. Liverpool are doing really well and are top of the league, and they have some very good youngsters coming through. Now would be a great time to start listing which of the players and youngsters you want to move on to replace with players from relegated teams. Every week I read of the fans, win or lose, who want players out of the club. From my perspective the club should do no more than a little bit of refinement - but what do I know.}


 

 

Click To View This Thread

01 Mar 2019 03:18:00
Anything but Nike. Would rather we just use body paint than get into a deal with them. Their kits are utterly atrocious. They're all the same and even when they're 'different' it's the same. Would much rather stick with new balance. I can't think of a single kit Nike has made that I thought was even ok. and I'd be happy to hear some examples to prove me wrong.

lfcohio

 

 

Click To View This Thread

14 Jun 2018 00:39:42
Gotta be firminio. His numbers this season (goals, assists, tackles) we're incredible. Not to mention his work rate. If he's not in the team, Salah doesn't break the record. Don't get me wrong, Salah is great. But he could also be replaced. Firminio is something special and we'd be happy pressed to find another player that can contribute as much as he does. Suarez had the best of both firminio and Salah. But he left and so for me, it has to be firminio. Plus firminio has a much better attitude and team mentality.

lfcohio

 

 

Click To View This Thread

30 May 2018 03:37:35
Best player my ass.

lfcohio

 

 

Click To View This Thread

17 May 2018 23:25:44
Why would you ever want Nike as a sponsor? Better run around in trash bags than those horrendous kits. they've never made a good looking kit for any side in and sport, ever. Horrible company. As for Adidas. yawn. same crap year after year.

lfcohio

{Ed0333's Note - the new Liverpool home kit is an abomination it looks like some YTS kid did it in his lunch break for a laugh.


 

 





Change Consent