Liverpool Rumours Member Posts

 

Thirdmate's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded
Correct Score Competition:

Not entered
Correct Score Competition
Flat Out Racing:

Not played Flat Out Racing


No Profile Picture uploaded

Team:


Where from:


Favourite player:


Best team moment:


Interests:


Timezone:




Thirdmate's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Thirdmate's Posts

 

 

To Thirdmate's last 5 banter posts

 

To Thirdmate's last 5 rumour replies

 

Thirdmate has no Rumours Posts

 

 

Thirdmate's banter posts with other poster's replies to Thirdmate's banter posts

 

02 Jan 2017 12:55:30
Ed 02 you stated the club is in a lot of debt yet the owners say this is not the case. How much debt are we in?

Thirdmate

{Ed002's Note - How much doesn't matter. I have no idea why the owners have said that - perhaps they need to look at the accounts and do their sums over the stadium?}


1.) 02 Jan 2017 17:01:04
Ed, surely there's something out there that proves Liverpool is in big debt? This is why people are confused, because literally everyone else with a voice in the media is saying otherwise.

{Ed002's Note - The accounts last year show a big debt and the owners also writing off a very large debt to get it off the books - since then they have made another payment for the stadium - but you keep trust everyone one in the media if they are saying that is not the case.

So what are the media saying then?}


2.) 02 Jan 2017 17:23:34
The media are saying that they're not in big debt, as the owners are. This is why it's so confusing.

{Ed002's Note - Keep saying the same thing doesn't help Nick. Who in the media is saying what? Who within the owners doesn't understand the accounts, doesn't understand the £60 odd million write off in the last set of accounts nor payments made for the stadium work and what are they saying about it?}


3.) 02 Jan 2017 17:25:45
Maybe that's why the media say otherwise, because the owners wrote off a debt Liverpool owed them.

{Ed002's Note - They did - but they get it back when they sell the club - all they have done is offset debt against their investment (devaluing it) - so who in the media is saying what about the debt the accounts show and the further payments for the stadium? You seem to be (again) struggling with simple finances Nick.}


4.) 02 Jan 2017 17:35:57
It's more the fact that the media *don't* say anything about any large debt associated with Liverpool, despite the fact they used to a few years ago, that's why it's hard to find someone in the media. To be fair to you I should have worded it better.

I'm not that bad with finances, I just wasn't aware they only temporarily wrote it off. But anyone on this website is going to look like a financial pleb compared to your knowledge, so go easy.

{Ed002's Note - Ok Nick - I think we should let this go - the new argument that the media are saying nothing about Liverpool's debt means that there isn't one doesn't hold too much water. The Debate Society of Berkeley would struggle to persuade me of that being true.

On a brighter note, there was nothing in the press today about Reus joing Liverpool this month - makes you think?}


 

 

08 Nov 2015 05:41:08
Hope the pato rumours are just that
He is not good enough. Milan let him go, at the time no other European club came in for him. The papers are saying the fee would be 14m. This is ridiculous for a player who is injury prone and would be a gamble at best. If he is signed it may be an indication that Sturridge's injury is worse than expected. He is not a Klopp player.

Thirdmate

1.) 08 Nov 2015 06:40:53
i really doubt klopp will go for pato.

he is just as big of a gamble as balotelli was. did i say gamble? maybe i shouldev said mistake.


2.) 08 Nov 2015 07:39:50
It's all bulls***. That club president who's being attributed to those quotes- he never said that.


3.) 08 Nov 2015 07:55:56
He was once regarded as the finest striker in European football. I still remember his goal against Barcelona. Dribble past half the team inside 10 mts.

{Ed001's Note - he was never regarded as such, he was hyped as potentially the best, never that he actually was.}


4.) 08 Nov 2015 08:57:53
Would it have potentially been a similar situation with Continuo?


5.) 08 Nov 2015 09:40:33
A lot was expected of him. We was pretty much Neymar before Neymar was Neymar.


6.) 08 Nov 2015 13:11:49
Neymar since he has been 15 has been known to be a special special talent that would end up being one of the worlds best players, which has happened! Pato has always been overhyped and flopped wherever he went in europe!


7.) 08 Nov 2015 14:07:17
Pato's over rated, over hyped and a crock. The club should steer clear off this disaster. No need to add to the club's already bloated list of expensive flops, especially with all the FFP issues.


 

 

 

Thirdmate's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

26 Aug 2017 10:25:07
Papers are saying fee of 92m euros he isn't worth it.

Thirdmate

 

 

 

Thirdmate has no Banter Replies

 





Change Consent